Rainer Schoepf writes: > Richard Walker writes: >=20 > > Clearly the reason we do not have this for CTAN is the fact that = TDS > > is still only a `draft' standard. >=20 > No! The reason is that there are not enough people in the TeX world > that work on CTAN. Touch\'{e}! But surely there can not be a CTAN.pm before TDS is widely accepted (even if it is not finalized). On the other hand, maybe the availability of a CTAN.pm would encourage wide acceptance of TDS? > Most standards are drafts anyway. Errr . . . whatever you say :-) Maybe it's just because I don't think leaving it at version 0.9993 sends the right sort of message. > Rainer Sch=F6pf (wearing his CTAN hat) Richard (with tie, no hat)