> Sure, thats why I said it *shouldnt* be an author constraint. People
> who convert LaTeX should do so properly, or say up front that they
> cannot do it, rather than unreasonably constraining authors.
>
> latex2html is a red herring, of course. in practise, i don't think any
> large scale publisher goes this route.

Astronomy and Astrophysics, published by Springer, asks for manuscripts
in TeX and has an on-line version which includes HTML, but I don't know
how they convert it.


--
Phillip Helbig                          Email .......... [log in to unmask]
Nuffield Radio Astronomy Laboratories   Tel. ..... +44 1477 571 321 (ext. 297)
Jodrell Bank                            Fax ................. +44 1477 571 618
Macclesfield                            Telex ................. 36149 JODREL G
UK-Cheshire SK11 9DL                    Web .... http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pjh/