> Sure, thats why I said it *shouldnt* be an author constraint. People > who convert LaTeX should do so properly, or say up front that they > cannot do it, rather than unreasonably constraining authors. > > latex2html is a red herring, of course. in practise, i don't think any > large scale publisher goes this route. Astronomy and Astrophysics, published by Springer, asks for manuscripts in TeX and has an on-line version which includes HTML, but I don't know how they convert it. -- Phillip Helbig Email .......... [log in to unmask] Nuffield Radio Astronomy Laboratories Tel. ..... +44 1477 571 321 (ext. 297) Jodrell Bank Fax ................. +44 1477 571 618 Macclesfield Telex ................. 36149 JODREL G UK-Cheshire SK11 9DL Web .... http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pjh/