Robin Fairbairns wrote -- > there were plans, once upon a time, remember. that's why there's > `supported' and `other'. plans for what? As I recall, that division was made as it is one that the ctan maintainers could manage ... it was not much to do with what anyone thought was more (or less) useful. > but what with writers of high-quality stuff (such as donald arseneau) > going for other/misc for most submissions, and the fact that pretty > much anything goes to supported unless the author claims he really > doesn't want it, the distinction has rather faded. I had not realised that it was breaking down in such amazing ways! But I sympathise with Donald not wanting to claim any support for his stuff:-)! chris