David Carlisle writes: > that is marked up in XML. It is true, that especially for mathematics, > there is not (yet?) a realistic authoring environment that produces > mathematics marked up to an XML dtd. i know it won't suit the high-falutin' 20th century mathematicians amongst us, but for the great unwashed MathType is perfectly plausible. indeed returning to Hans: >The *ML movements are currently pretty orthogonal to what TeX can offer: >The *ML offer fast, simple typesetting, suitable for WWW and simpler types > of printing. its a shame we don't have a competition for "the most inaccurate and ill-informed remarks made on latex-l each month". sebastian "low blood pressure" rahtz