David Carlisle wrote: >In response to your message I just fetched doc.dtx off ctan [snip] >This is using >Package: doc 1999/03/25 v2.0h Standard LaTeX documentation package (FMi) > >which version do you have? Ah, well, it seems I owe you an apology. Appearently, I downloaded v2.0g the very same day it got replaced by v2.0h, my FTP client marked the downloaded file's "last changed" date with the download date, and when I later looked for the fixed version, I mistook it for the one I had, since they were marked by the same date. Bloody stupid mistake, really. But isn't updated files supposed to be listed in the patch file (it didn't say anything about doc.dtx)? [snip] >(by the way, latex-l isn't the bug address) (It wasn't intended as one, although it might have turned out to be something very similar. My reaction was that when bug reports were submitted a month and a half ago, but still nothing has happened, the time for bug reports are over and the time for letters to the editor has come.) Lars Hellström