> >The point is that not only do you get the down-translation for print > >in LaTeX but also you can write (in the programming language of your > >choice) translators to whatever other formats you wish to reach. (Of > >course, very clever things in this direction have been done using TeX, > >the program, but I suspect that there is a limit to this approach.) > > Maybe Springer is learning from Elsevier Sciences mistakes. They focused > on SGML for years --- and look what happened to *their* share prices :0! > -- > Y&Y, Inc. mailto:[log in to unmask] http://www.YandY.com (M) Is the writer who I think he is? Those translators could even be written in lisp. :-) In fact, I may even go that way myself eventually. -- Bill