> a) have a look at the output > > b) have a try to define your own TOC layout (take my abstract spec of the > available keys from the previous mail) > > c) can you define the layout you are looking for? > if not: > - are there keys missing for the current templates? > - are there other templates missing that do radically different things? Yes. Entries grouped in a single paragraph. For instance: 1) First section, 3. 2) Second section, 5. 3) Third section, 7. 4)... It so happens that I'm working in a new release of a package for formatting of toc entries which already provides such a kind of indexes in the currently available version. However, adapting it to the suggested templates is turning out to be more difficult as I expected because most of things are handled in a quite different way. The same applies to partial tocs. However, I will persist (I have got no much time, I'm afraid), and if I get some result I will send to this list. > - are the keys perhaps the wrong ones? > > d) share your thoughts and sample trials with us > > e) how difficult is it to implement a given design? \bye Javier