Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 18:28:55 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bjoern
> Yes, it looks right. But what is making me think is, that the original
> calculations seem right. It appears, that the floatbox-origin is shifted
> somewhere. So maybe it is really something in the float-setup or
> float-boxing that is wrong, and my fix is just a work-around.
> Especially, as the offset seems to depend on the spancnt of the float,
> something that is not used in this part of xo-new.
>
Yes, I agree that that seems odd.
> I still have some trouble tracing the float-placement, so I have not found
> anything there, that looks wrong. So that's what I meant with "the right
> place".
>
Hmm, yes! Tricky stuff geometry.
That kind of placment stuff needs a cleaner interface, probably in a
seperate `module'.
chris
|
|
|