> Thank you! I should have examined this more thoroughly. I used dox
> because I needed a macro to describe options. But now I see that I
> can say \NewDocElement{Option}{option}, which is fine.
one of the reasons for upgrading doc after such a long time was to add
the ability to document other kind of code beside macros/envs so it how
essentially offers what dox offered in the past but with a somewhat
different API and a bit more functionality.
the other reason for upgrading was to enable hyperref support out of the
box, because this is also usually wanted/needed.
>
> Something similar affects the colordoc package because it redefines
> doc's \macro@finish, which has been changed.
>
> What should we do? Will the LaTeX3 team contact the authors of these
> packages or should rather I do it myself?
If could would do that and talk to Didier and Federico, it would be very
much appreciated ... we are stretched a bit thin, but if you prefer
I'll do it.
Might also be worth talking to Scott because his skeletons could then
perhaps also see some update
