Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:33:10 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Le 18/07/2015 12:26, Stephan Hennig a écrit :
> Say I write a pure Lua package replacing
> all A glyphs by Z in whatever callback. How do I hook into that
> callback in a format independent way? A luatexbase package that
> abstracts from minimal format implementations (as far as such are needed
> in a format) would solve that issue.
This seems highly theoretical to me... If you want a package developped
in a format-independant way, I guess you mean Plain, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and
home-made formats. But luatexbase is not ported to ConTeXt and as far as
I know, there is no callback management in ConTeXt, you can't hook into
a callback without breaking everything... So format-independant packages
are already technically impossible and I fail to really understand your
point... can you give a more precise example of a possible problem?
Also, luatexbase has not moved for a couple of years, and there's no one
to maintain or develop it, so I think what's currently happening is
quite a good thing.
Thank you,
--
Elie
|
|
|