LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:09:01 +0000
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On 03/01/2011 13:56, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 02:39 PM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
>>
>> Reading the source code, I guess \directlua behaves identically to
>> \immediate\write, while \latelua corresponds to \write. If that is
>> true, then the naming convention of the \iow_ macros should be
>> applied.
>
> The correspondence is correct, but \directlua is expandable
> (\immediate\write is not).

Thanks Taco (and Philipp). I will revisit the l3luatex stuff later today 
and try to tighten both the expl3 function names and description up.
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2