LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J.Fine" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:19:41 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> J.Fine wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand what it is you want to do, but it does seem to
> me that TeX macros are not a suitable language.
> >
> >
> > Jonathan
>
> Sorry, I'm a bit lost!  Which bit of the thread are we talking about?
> (xparse as-a-concept, post-processing arguments, how to specify
> arguments, ... )

All of the above, taken together.

One starts with parsing key-value arguments in TeX macros, then further features are required, and you start adding features to the LaTeX macros for list processing and the like, and before you know it something has arise that is too complicated for TeX macros.

CVS, as I recall, started as shell scripts to support concurrent use of RCS.  But after a while, shell scripts are no longer suitable.

Hope this helps.

--
Jonathan


The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2