LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 May 2014 08:39:51 +0930
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1113 bytes) , minimal-plain.tex (2449 bytes)
Hi David,

Sorry for the slow reply on this:

On 20 May 2014, at 7:10 pm, David Carlisle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I had a bit of trouble getting it to run so I thought I'd ask about those
> first (rather than about the actual proposal) in case others are having same
> issues, and to check we are seeing the same result in the end.

Confession time: I havenít had a working LuaTeX since I moved everything to a newer computer and only just managed to install a pretest TeX Live 2014.

I can now see what the problem is: there has been a change in XeTeXís maths handling so that remapping back to ascii for class 7 glyphs is indeed necessary after all. I have to admit I was extremely surprised when it worked the other day without the remapping.


> As posted the second display headed by "Roman, italic, and bold math families:"
> made three blocks of coloured missing glyph markers. Was that expected?

No ó it worked in TeX Live 2013, but not in 2014 :)

* * *

Iíve attached a now-working example below; it also runs in plain LuaTeX but for some reason the colours donít show up in maths.

Hope this helps,
Will






ATOM RSS1 RSS2