LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Donald Arseneau <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:53:57 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Frank Mittelbach <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> David Kastrup writes:
>
>  > >  a) this doesn't help for LICR objects like \" as they potentially execute
>  > >  \accent and that bombs in math
>  >
>  > Nope.  We would have the case where \"a has a proper letter
>  > equivalent.  In that case we would write the following (excuse the
>  > illegal notation
>  >
>  > \def{\"a}{\ifmmode \relax \ifmmode \ddot a\else \fi\else \fi}
>
> nope nope (imho:-)
>
> that's for the case where \"a is precisely *not* executing an \accent but is
> actually a glyph in the current font

But that is the only case you have to handle!  \accent combinations
don't have the right kerning anyway, so just stick \relax before
the \accent.

The (killer) problem I see has already been alluded to: The inputenc
characters are already active, so you have to have a single definition
that works for both the initial expansion of the input text and as the
math-active character, without recursion.

David's usage of "" is probably part of the "illegal notation", but if
I may either clarify or fix:

Definition to convert from LICR to glyph:

\def{\"a}{\ifmmode \relax % make sure we are in math mode to stay
          \ifmmode \ddot a%
          \else \string \fi
          \else \string \fi}

Definition to convert from LICR to \accent:

\def{\"a}{\relax % Take That!
     \ifmmode \ddot a\else \"{a}\fi}

Donald Arseneau                          [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2