LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: :nFT tests
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:34:12 +1030
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
On 30/10/2008, at 8:04 PM, Morten Høgholm wrote:

> True, it gets the job done. As you indicate, stylistically it does not
> look particularly nice. I am not claiming the FT variant is perfect
> but at least it is quite clear what it does and clarity of the code is
> important.

Yes, I agree.

> However, I guess it is not particular important to avoid
> reading the arguments twice so we could just drop this FT variant
> completely.

I dunno, any more.
Could even have a command that expands to
   #1\use_arg_ii:nn\use_arg_i:nn
or whatever to reverse a regular TF conditional.

I guess we should continue to mull over things but leave it as is for  
now...

W

ATOM RSS1 RSS2