LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:09:27 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: LaTeX Release 2005/12/01
From:
Heiko Oberdiek <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:13:56PM -0500, Karl Berry wrote:

>     from a practical point of view I personally prefer to have all
>     production files for one type of task in one directory rather than
>     in 2
> 
> Indeed, I actually think it would be a great step if we could abandon
> TDS with its harebrained(*) splitting by file format, and every package
> simply be installed in /some/texmf/packagename-vvvv, as the author
> creates it.

A mess, then TeX randomly selects language.dat out of five,
graphics.cfg out of fifty, ...?

Yours sincerely
  Heiko <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2