LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:19:34 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:43:05 +0200, Morten Høgholm
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>The FT variant was never meant to be heavily used - just a shuffle
>variant so to speak.

Given that, does the general test-creating macro need to include this
variant?  If it really only a very small number of cases, would it be better
to create the appropriate macros on an as-used basis (and include them in
the documentation)?
--
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2