Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:04:11 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Will Robertson wrote:
> On 23/10/2009, at 6:55 AM, Joseph Wright wrote:
>
>> This would allow things like:
>>
>> > \ReturnVariable { \MakeHarmless\ReturnVariable }
>> % Will absorb one more argument, as required
>>
>> (using \MakeHarmless from xdoc). That doesn't work at present as the
>> return has to be in a toks.
>>
>> As Lars points out, that is quite a bit more flexible at the cost of a
>> little complexity in the syntax.
>
>
> I'm not sure that I see how this is any more flexible?
> Oh, simply that your argument processor doesn't have to be hard-coded to
> use \l_xparse_arg_toks.
> But hang on, can't you do the same thing at present by just writing
>
> > { \MakeHarmless\l_xparse_arg_toks }
>
> ?
No. \MakeHarmless has the syntax:
\MakeHarmless <macro> <input>
where <macro> is used for the output. So if you try to use a toks here,
it will fail to work correctly. You'd need a wrapper function, which is
what Lars is suggesting we should avoid.
--
Joseph Wright
|
|
|