Hi all!

I'm writing a large package in LaTeX3 right now (a rewrite of
'concepts' actually). I keep feeling the need to write some general
purpose functions. For now I'm putting them as private functions in my
package but I was wondering if they might not be a nice addition to
the standard modules.

However, even the example idea I mentioned in TeX.se chat seemed to be
controversial, so I'll start with just that one. It's a small set of
functions I wrote to scan ahead in the input stream to find modifiers
and various delimited optional arguments without having to write
auxiliary functions.

First there's `\scan_tokens:nnw`, which scans ahead for any tokens
that are in `#1`, grabs them and calls the (literal) function `#2`
with the resulting token list as an argument. In my package I use them
to grab digits and modifiers. Example:

------------------------------------------------------------

\ExplSyntaxOn
    \NewDocumentCommand \GrabDigits {} {
        \scan_tokens:nnw {1234567890} {
            (##1)
        }
    }

    \NewDocumentCommand \GrabModifiers {} {
        \scan_tokens:nnw {!*^} {
            (\tl_to_str:n{##1})
        }
    }
\ExplSyntaxOff

\GrabDigits 76543xyz   % yields (76543)xyz

\GrabModifiers ^!^*$x$   % yields (^!^*)$x$

------------------------------------------------------------

I've also written several related functions, like `\scan_tokens:nnFw`
which calls `F` if no tokens were found. Also `\scan_delimited:NNnw`
and `\scan_delimited:NNnFw` which are essentially an inline wrapper
for an xparse `r` argument.

I've attached a MWE. The implementation could be more efficient. I
just felt like doing a recursive version. It would have been
expandable if only `\peek_meaning_remove:NTF` was. :-)

Please tell me what you think!

-- 
www.mhelvens.net