LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:52:22 +1030
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: LaTeX3 8-bit only?
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
On 11/02/2010, at 10:41 AM, Robin Fairbairns wrote:

> i thought philipp was suggesting that the luatex 2012 date may present a
> final window of opportunity for latex.  the real point is that there
> _needn't_ be a "physical" causal relationship between luatex and latex 3
> for the final advent of luatex to kill of the ambitions of latex 3.

Are we talking about "LuaTeX" or "ConTeXt Mk IV"? That's an entirely different discussion, and one in which I'm much less qualified to comment.

-- Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2