LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:09:43 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Hello all,

Will has worked quite a lot on l3doc. One of the newer ideas to to
replace the old \StopEventually / \Finale idea with:

\begin{documentation}
...
\end{documentation}
\begin{implementation}
...
\end{implementation}

This is, I think, a good idea. However, I wonder if a second level of
control might be a good thing. At the moment, the first section contains
all of the documentation. However, if you consider some user package, it
would be helpful to have the user functions and internal stuff
documented separately.  I wondered about:


\begin{documentation}
  \begin{user-functions}
   ...
  \end{user-functions}
  \begin{internal-functions}
   ...
  \end{internal-functions}
\end{documentation}

or

\begin{documentation}
...
\end{documentation}
\begin{programmers-documentation}
...
\end{programmers-documentation}

or ...

What do other people think?
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2