Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 2 Dec 1998 11:16:08 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]> writes:
: Your description seems to indicate what I think is the case, TeX/LaTeX is
: used when one gets serious in the sense that one has this manuscript in
: which the details must come out right. WYSIWYG does then normally not
: suffice, at least not with the math details, so TeX comes into place.
These fussy things can, in fact, almost always be handled well with
*correct* LaTeX, as documented in Lamport's book. The "Companion" is
for added authoring convenience.
: I think it is well-known by now, that all these mass-consumer movements,
: which the *ML currently represents, usually lacks crucial quality.
: Eventually such quality might built in, of course.
Only because very few elitist mathematicians have been involved (up to
now).
: But until then, there will be a need for TeX/LaTeX.
And beyond then, as well!
-- Bill
|
|
|