On 11/11/2008, at 4:53 PM, Joseph Wright wrote:
> I see that \tlist_reverse:n has no \tlp... version. Is this
> deliberate:
> one might be handy!
Seems like a good function to have, to me.
I'll add it to the list :)
On first blush, it doesn't seem quite as "easy" as \tlist_reverse:n.
Any suggestions?
Will