Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:45:07 +0930 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-3-656368412; micalg=sha1;
protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi again,
Sorry for the flurry of posts.
On 06/08/2009, at 3:23 PM, Joseph Wright wrote:
> Will Robertson wrote:
>>
>> One comment I have here is that in the future I don't see many people
>> defining weird combinations of arguments due to the prevalence of
>> keyval-style argument processing instead. I'd even think about
>> dropping
>> coordinate-style parenthesis input like "(x,y)" based on this. (Which
>> can be emulated easily enough with "d()" and a clist mapping in the
>> input.)
>
> The main reason for keeping a letter for (x,y) is that it can be a
> mandatory argument in LaTeX2e, so needs special handling.
If all we're trying to do is be able to emulate LaTeX2e, is there
anything wrong with writing something like this?:
... { d() }{
\IfNoValueTF {#1} { \ERROR } {
The real definition
}
}
Will
|
|
|