Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Dec 1998 12:17:48 +0000 |
In-Reply-To: |
Your message of "Wed, 02 Dec 1998 12:58:12 +0100."
<v03110701b28ad954fa6b@[130.237.37.61]> |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> At 11:23 +0000 1998/12/02, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
> >> I think the use of TeX is expanding: It is not only the standard in math,
> >> but also pretty much at the XXX archive, and in many quarters of computer
> >> science.
> >
> >i see no actual sign that use of tex is expanding. i even see
> >students around here using word for theoretical computer science
> >(which is maths that somehow doesn't want to speak its name ;-)...
>
> I guess you only see what is expanding the fastest. (I do not see that
> students have a great need for TeX either -- did they ever have that in the
> past?) Nevertheless, I do not see that those uses of TeX will be replaced
> very quickly by something *ML that cannot do the job.
the majority of phd students here still do their dissertations in
latex (characteristically awful latex, but there you are...).
a goodly proportion of undergraduates do final year project
dissertations that way, too. (although they often produce better
latex since they don't have as much time to invent awful habits.)
i see no reason why a *ml "that can't do the job" would be inhibited
from encroaching. not doing the job hasn't stopped word, after all...
robin
|
|
|