Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 1997 16:50:01 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: |
<v02130505b03c5bfb49df@[130.237.37.138]> |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> interest in XML, whatever that is. :-)
http://www.sil.org/sgml/xml.html
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-html40-970708/> (see, I am very helpful with ref's
> :-). It concerns the dynamic behaviour of links, and stuff which I have not
> studied yet in detail. (There is also this other movement with cgi-scripts
> coming along now, which should perhaps be mentioned.)
agreed, the hypertex spec may need updating.
personally, i hope HTML 4 remains a gleam in the eye of Raggett and
chums and we are never plagued with it.
> I figure, then it does not belong in the LaTeX3 group anyway? So if you
just because you dont author in LaTeX doesnt mean you dont *use*
LaTeX. I'd like to author in SGML/XML, and use (La)TeX as my
formatting engine. does that make a renegade?
> future development of electronic media. Hypermedia is taking off with such
> a breakneck speed,
so people have been telling me for 10 years now.
> future. On the other hand, if the resolution of graphical displays
> increases, TeX still has provided some experiences for how to produce good
> typesetting.
and TeX still has a great place for making printed pages back from the
hypermediazed stuff
Sebastian
|
|
|