Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:00:34 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
from a practical point of view I personally prefer to have all production files for one type of task in one directory rather than in 2 and not find, say babel.def in generic but babel.sty in latex, but I guess there are arguments for both
cheers
frank
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Karl Berry
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2006 01:35
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: LaTeX Release 2005/12/01
Regarding babel, I don't understand, why some TeX distributions
put *all* files below TDS/*/generic/, from my readme.txt:
There is no deep reason behind it for TL -- the ctan2tds.pl kind of steers one in the direction of choosing a single format
(latex/generic/whatever) for a package. Exceptions take more code.
Can't say why for teTeX and vtex.
I agree that it would be better to use tex/latex/babel and tex/generic/babel as appropriate.
When it is time to update TL, I hope to use your bundles and then everything will be better.
Thanks,
Karl
|
|
|