Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:03:08 +0930 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-3-250983690; micalg=sha1;
protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Uwe,
On 21/04/2009, at 8:30 PM, Uwe Lück wrote:
> I wonder whether this is a bug that should go to the LaTeX Bug
> Database, since it only
> -- is about an internal
> -- contradicts what one might expect
> -- while it is not clear to me whether this can affect LaTeX's
> function on the user-level
This certainly seems like a bug to me, although I had to modify your
examples to see the error:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\makeatletter
\in@{bonbon}{bon}\ifin@ YES\else NO\fi % gives YES
\in@{bonbon}{bonb}\ifin@ YES\else NO\fi % gives NO
\in@{client-to-client}{client-to}\ifin@ YES\else NO\fi % gives NO
\in@{client-to-client}{client-to-}\ifin@ YES\else NO\fi % gives YES
\makeatother
\end{document}
The tendency seems to be not to change the internals of LaTeX2e, but
I'd be happy to replace the current implementation of \in@ with a more
correct version. What do others think? If others are amenable to the
change, would you be willing to write the new version?
Cheers,
Will
|
|
|