> >The point is that not only do you get the down-translation for print
> >in LaTeX but also you can write (in the programming language of your
> >choice) translators to whatever other formats you wish to reach. (Of
> >course, very clever things in this direction have been done using TeX,
> >the program, but I suspect that there is a limit to this approach.)
>
> Maybe Springer is learning from Elsevier Sciences mistakes. They focused
> on SGML for years --- and look what happened to *their* share prices :0!
> --
> Y&Y, Inc. mailto:[log in to unmask] http://www.YandY.com (M)
Is the writer who I think he is?
Those translators could even be written in lisp. :-)
In fact, I may even go that way myself eventually.
-- Bill