Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:43:48 +1030 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 2010-10-04 11:57:27 +1030, "David J. Perry"
<[log in to unmask]> said:
> Ross and Will,
>
>> So the first question should be what is the version of XeTeX that MikTeX
>> is providing.
>> And is David actually using that, or still an earlier version, as I was on
>> a Mac.
>> If the primitive is not there, then the latest versions of expl3 and
>> fontspec just will not work, and may not even succeed in loading
>> successfully. Is that not correct?
>
> As the person who raised the issue, I would like to help solve it.
> Unfortunately, the problem developed on my machine upstate, where I was for
> the weekend. I'm now back in the city to teach tomorrow morning, and my
> machine here has not had the MiKTeX update that I applied this weekend. If
> no one else sends in an example, I will certainly do so when I get back
> upstate on Friday.
On further reflection, even confirming that the "not-updated" case
compiles correctly would be helpful. (As it would indicate
approximately when the error appeared.) Can you prepare the same
minimal example on your current setup?
Thanks,
Will
|
|
|