Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:31:50 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Joseph Wright a écrit :
> How do you see that working with things like \DeclareDocumentCommand.
> Two options come to mind:
>
> 1) Given them names which reflect the separation
> (\DeclareLaTeXDocumentCommand, etc.)
>
> 2) Add an extra "model" argument:
>
> \DeclareDocumentCommand { <model> } { <name> } { <argument-detail> }
> { <code> }
>
> where we make no assumptions about anything here and do something like
>
How about a global switch like \UseLaTeXeCommands (or whatever)? I tend to think
the current name is already long enough...
Anyway, if Frank's idea of having separate packages xparse-2e and maybe latter
xparse-gellmu or how knows, currently the switch is done by calling
\usepackage{xparse-2e}
or possibly another one (since l3 is still used on top on 2e at the moment), so
I guess the question will only arise latter. Anyway, probably only one on the
possibly various xparse-* will be used at the same time, so I don't see any
problem with them using the smae command name.
Manuel.
|
|
|