Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:00:32 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 05/08/2012 05:16, Will Robertson wrote:
> On 03/08/2012, at 9:53 PM, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
>
>> Admittedly, none of the three "solutions" is great. As Joseph notes,
>> we've gone for a single line in the l3 source. We could perhaps add
>> \def\^^M{\unskip\space\ignorespaces} to the \begin{syntax} setup: this
>> would allow
>>
>> \cs{some_function_with_a_very_long_name:nnnnn} \
>> \Arg{first argument} \Arg{second argument} \
>> \Arg{third argument} \Arg{fourth argument} \
>> \Arg{fifth argument}
>
> I've been thinking for a while that having \obeylines in the syntax environment (which predates my involvement on this code IIRC) has made certain things rather awkward.
>
> It would be an annoying change to have to implement in our sources, but what do you think about dropping \obeylines?
>
> -- Will
Seems sensible to me: we've altered how we approach using this
environment, and \obeylines is probably not that helpful.
--
Joseph Wright
|
|
|