Joseph Wright writes:
> Will Robertson wrote:
> > I noticed that recently too. I think it would be better to remove that
> > variant in the expl3 syntax, since it doesn't seem like it adds much of
> > importance but it adds a bit of obfuscation.
>
> As you probably guessed from the question, that would be my preferred
> solution too.
I agree with both of you.let's mark it as obsolete for now and wait for Morten
to speak up who introduced it (I guess)
frank