Hi,
Sorry for my slow reply :-(
On 13/06/2009, at 7:19 AM, Joseph Wright wrote:
> As you can see, I've attempted to simplify the structure, and creating
> keys is now a bit more like the method used in template. On the other
> hand, I've stuck with "properties" and not having them as single
> tokens.
> I've also kept the multiple choices idea and value required/forbidden.
This looks really nice to me. I think it is more useable and perhaps
more useful to have "real names" for the different types of key, and
as mentioned having a separate key for a default value is very nice
for later customisation.
Will