KIP-SPIKEY-USERS Archives

2015

KIP-SPIKEY-USERS@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andreas Stoeckel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Spikey neuromorphic system - User <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Nov 2015 10:17:06 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Thomas,

thank you for your reply and sorry for my late answer. I already
performed the experiments I described here last week, but had no
time to reply until now.

> In particular, the parameters drvifall (affects the time
> constant and synaptic weight; this parameter first, because it is
> more sensitive) and drviout (affects mostly the synaptic weight)
> are adjusted until a target rate of the postsynaptic neurons is 
> reached. As these parameters can be configured only row-wise for 
> synapses, firing rates are averaged across all hardware neurons 
> during calibration. Due to this protocol, synapses are
> calibrated to generate EPSPs with comparable impact on the firing
> rates of postsynaptic neurons (i.e. area under EPSP), but not
> necessarily with comparable time constants.
Ok, so as far as I understand it the LIF parameters "w" (synaptic
weight) and "tauM" (membrane time constant with tauM = cM / gL)
influence the hidden "tauE" (excitatory synapse time constant)
parameter. That's also what some quick experiments on the hardware
showed.

So in case "tauM" and "w" stay fixed I can calculate "tauE" and
adapt the other parameters (e.g. threshold and leak potential
"eL"/"eTh") without implicitly changing "tauE". That's enough for me.

> As it is difficult to extract the synaptic time constant from the
> membrane potential, we can not provide you with numbers on how
> correlated time constants and area under EPSPs are.
Well, that turns out to be really simple: The estimation of tauE
from a membrane potential trace is a matter of few seconds. I've
simply hooked my (rather naive) Downhill-Simplex implementation onto
my high-speed single-neuron AdEx integrator and defined the RMSE
between simulated and reference membrane potential trace as cost
function. See attachment for the results.

In case you're interested: I'll publish the source code in December.

Again, thank you for your answer and best wishes from the
not-so-far-away Kirchheimbolanden,

Andreas

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWOc0SAAoJEGiL9AshMiPd0BQH/1WfTlSgll4dlx8nIdx4tMVV
QSGnTy/gZBxiafKutIwEjxM0eXo6FPhs3EaM3MtWMRUFsW99QcerWf39osrxFJhK
w/5PgIUmzfkkMiBh/yVJb2l4LHiRURbbK/VcLmW8v6TgfLRvpzrheqUGhUaIngKq
Cbo6+3diX+dUr7kYc0ZWZmAVFLEGchzT/9LmZ+uFiE6Izwgge97Q0fFd/wj+cWLu
HoFJjB8Er5GCkWWGCQRnW5Kr4UTzS99dgbUogjE+4LqcO76Q6V+hJEqgyFRIiCQs
jAN9cNY13VKcbIdv8u5wJIBJM82W4KU/BFis7lsMn24faGyNenEEMgu7/x9vUVg=
=29Wd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the KIP-SPIKEY-USERS list, click the following link:
https://listserv.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=KIP-SPIKEY-USERS


ATOM RSS1 RSS2