LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:34:16 +1030
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Hi,

Regardless of my last email, I've now committed a minor change to  
expl3 repository by which all of \let:NN, \glet:NN, \let_new:NN, and  
\glet_new:NN are defined with \def_protected_long_new, and the  
variants are plain old \def_new. (No change, then, to  \let:NN at all.  
Just bringing the others into line.)

The only real change this makes that I'm aware of is that
   \let_new:NN \par \foo
will now complain '\par already defined' rather than 'runaway  
argument'. I think this is sensible since \let:NN itself does allow  
\par.

Let me know if I've missed something :)

Cheers,
Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2