LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"William F. Hammond" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Dec 1998 11:16:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]> writes:

: Your description seems to indicate what I think is the case, TeX/LaTeX is
: used when one gets serious in the sense that one has this manuscript in
: which the details must come out right. WYSIWYG does then normally not
: suffice, at least not with the math details, so TeX comes into place.

These fussy things can, in fact, almost always be handled well with
*correct* LaTeX, as documented in Lamport's book.  The "Companion" is
for added authoring convenience.

: I think it is well-known by now, that all these mass-consumer movements,
: which the *ML currently represents, usually lacks crucial quality.
: Eventually such quality might built in, of course.

Only because very few elitist mathematicians have been involved (up to
now).

: But until then, there will be a need for TeX/LaTeX.

And beyond then, as well!

                                   -- Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2