Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote:
> Joseph Wright a écrit :
>>> Personally, I liked xparse-alt's original method, but I'm happy to leave
>>> it like this until complaints start coming in :)  (Which I'm not sure
>>> will happen.)
>> I'm not too fussed either way: it was just easier to code the way it is
>> done. How do others view this? I can soon put the auto-magic back if
>> that is the consensus.
> 
> I think I'd prefer the automagic way, but it's ok for me either way.
> 
> Manuel.
> 

Okay, I'm taking it as a consensus that people would like the auto-magic
approach back.  I'll sort it out later today, and it should be in the
SVN either this evening or tomorrow.

For those not familiar, the idea is that terminal optional arguments do
not skip spaces, but others do.  So

\foo {stuff} [opt] {more stuff}

is allowed (as there is no confusion about what [opt] is for),b but

\foo{bar}[opt]    % Valid optional argument
\foo{bar}   [opt] % Not treated as an optional argument
-- 
Joseph Wright