LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 May 2001 19:36:19 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
At 18:59 +0200 2001/05/17, Lars Hellström wrote:
>>The \epsilon and \varepsilon are definitely semantically different in
>>(pure) math,
>
>Are they? Please give a verifiable example!

Here are two examples:
  $\epsilon\varepsilon R$
  $\varepsilon R$

Today one would probably write one of
  $\epsilon\in R$
  $\varepsilon\in R$
(perhaps with $R$ in black-board bold).

Also remember, if \epsilon and \varepsilon were semantically the same, as
in language, then you could interchange them freely in formulas. Cf. the
word "sin": If it is in English, altering it to say boldface does not
change the semantics. But if you do that in math it is probably the sine
function applied to some other math object (like matrices or something).

  Hans Aberg

ATOM RSS1 RSS2