LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: xparse
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:21:55 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
J.Fine wrote:
> Perhaps you'll find, when you remove 'TeX macros' from the requirements specification you'll find that it's better not to use TeX macros for the implementation.

Fundamental point, of course, but the current plan is that LaTeX3 will
work with pdfTeX, XeTeX and LuaTeX. If we were going down the ConTeXt
"LuaTeX-only" route, then I'd quite possibly agree. But we're not (at
the moment!).
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2