LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J.Fine" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:08:28 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Manuel wrote:

> > Thank you.  It's not the only nice thing we can do.  Here are some more:
> >
> >   * Allow digits in control sequence names
> >   * Allow period in control sequence names
>
> I think the naming scheme (at the programming level at leat) has been
> discussed
> previously and is now considered stable. Let's not re-discuss again and
> again
> points were decisions are already made. (And btw, I personnaly think the
> namign
> scheme in expl3 is good.)

My suggestion is compatible with the LaTeX3 naming scheme.  Did you think it was not?

> >   * Allow '~' to produce a space /in all circumstances/
> >
> What would be the purpose?

So that
   \this ~ \that
has as space between \this and \that, for example.  Or to get several spaces in a row.


Apologies for not getting back to you earlier.

--
Jonathan


The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2