LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Frank Mittelbach <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 May 2011 23:45:49 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Joseph Wright writes:

 > As I said in my other mail, at the moment xparse is about LaTeX2e
 > conventions using LaTeX3 ideas. So there is no danger of dropping
 > trailing optional arguments at the moment! I'd also note that there is
 > an outstanding question on the coffin code about whether optional
 > arguments, a keyval approach or something in between is best.

yeah there is :-) I'm dead against it .. no not really. But I'm not really in
favor of it either. But not here under this subject line

 > So I certainly don't regard this question as resolved one way or the other
 > at present: at the moment, I'm just worried about spaces :-)

very wise. :-))

ATOM RSS1 RSS2