LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Joel C. Salomon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 17:33:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Hi again.

Is there some preferred style for referring to a family of function
variants?  For example, from xpeek:

% \begin{macro}[aux]{\@@_if_in:NNTF}
%   \begin{arguments}
%     \item Token-list to search through (the “haystack”)
%     \item Token to search for (the “needle”)
%   \end{arguments}
%   Among the \cs{tl_if_in:**\textit{TF}} conditionals
%   defined in \pkg{expl3}, \cs{tl_if_in:NNTF} is missing.
%   But since that’s the functionality I need, define it:
%    \begin{macrocode}

Is “\tl_if_in:**TF” (with or without “TF” being italicized) a
recognizable, non-ambiguous way to refer to those functions as a set,
or is there a nomenclature already in use that I should rather adopt?

—Joel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2