LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:14:54 +1030
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Hi Frank,

I agree that various forms of \exp_after might end up not being useful  
all that often.

On 08/12/2008, at 4:58 AM, Frank Mittelbach wrote:

> we may want to have something like the above eventually (then again  
> perhaps
> not) but i think we should first understand how we want to  
> rationalize the
> <arg-spec> as whatever we do or not do there has an influence on how  
> this
> here should look like


Sounds like a plan...

Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2