## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

#### View:

 Message: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Topic: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Author: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] Font: Proportional Font

Subject:

Re: XML (was quotes, a very long time ago)

From:

Date:

Wed, 11 Nov 1998 09:50:30 GMT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

 text/plain (74 lines)
 > I can't install a graphical MathML editor on every platform I use > (currently Linux, MSDOS, Win95, and VMS). The original (which I was not on) MathML committee made the decision to make MathML an XML application. (This was rather lucky as since then XML has really taken off and become the flavour of the month...) That inevitably meant that MathML would have a very verbose syntax, as the main difference between XML and SGML is that all the minimisation and shortcut markup features in SGML are thrown out of XML. They made the decision at around that time (which is still quite controversial, I suppose, that the important thing about MathML would be that it should markup the structure. The original charter had a requirement' that MathML (then called HTML Math) would be easy to edit by hand. This aim is _explicitly_ dropped in the MathML recommendation, hand editing (although nice) was not the priority. That being said, in fact it _is_ possible to hand write MathML, I have done quite a lot of that this year. However I do not think that that is really the way things will work. I do not think you will have to buy or install a graphical editor. For emacs for instance I would expect that you would be able to write something like $x^2+2$ and hit a key and have it insert the right thing which, for those that don't know MathML is either        x     2     +  2 in Presentation MathML or                x     2      2 in Content MathML (hope I got those right:-) me> Some of us will continue to use that kind of interface, but MathML me> offers the hope of using systems like Scientific Word, and even me> Microsoft Word via the MathType/Equation Editor thing and getting > Oh oh! First rule: good freely available TeX material should exits always. > An undergraduate student whose father's salary is 100 dollars in month > can't buy softwares, and this is the case in Iran. (Sorry for localizing.) I do understand the importance of free software. (I have, after all spent probably by now thousands of hours supporting free software of one sort or another). However the TeX world is not really the problem, TeX users are used to the idea of high level markup and transformations from one format to another while retaining meaning. But Microsoft is not ever going to make MSWord write TeX. It _will_ however make it write XML and possibly MathML. This gives the chance to bring the tex world' in to line, and in communication with, the (much larger) world using more conventional commercial software. The free tools will still be there and will get modified, given time, to support MathML and TeX equally well, it is getting the expensive tools to be any good that is harder. It's a strange world. > a simple MathML formula like the famous equivalent of > x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^{2} - 4ac}}{2a} > seems very obscure to me. but as of today the above is very obscure' to most systems other than latex, but the MathML version can be read (and written) by (test versions of) most of the major symbolic algebra packages and (hopefully soon) by the major web browsers, and also, by TeX. David`