## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

For use of the LaTeX discussion group. The purpose of this list is to discuss the development of the successor to LaTeX version 2e. Please direct general questions about version 2.09 and 2e to other lists. It is, however, perfectly allowed to point out deficiencies which should be improved in the next version. Note: ----- If mail to a list member is rejected three times, the corresponding mail address is deleted without further notice.
 expl3: Sequence stack Jonathan Spratte Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:48:10 +0100 Hi all,I got two little questions concerning stacks in expl3.1. What is the best way to build a stack for a sequence?The naive way would be to use something like\seq_push:No \l_my_stack_seq \l_my_seqto push and then\seq_pop:NN \l_my_stack_seq \l_my_seqBut this doesn't look like a clean usage of \seq_pop:NN and\seq_push:Nn.2. Should there be a higher level interface for stacks of the differentdata types in expl3? [More ...] No Replies
 Missing files for core LaTeX LARONDE Thierry Sat, 17 Oct 2020 19:16:55 +0200 Hello,FWIW, one can not dump LaTeX on a virgin system (say D. E. Knuthengines and fonts) if the following 4 tfm files are missing:line10.tfmlinew10.tfmlcircle10.tfmlcirclew10.tfmFor required/graphics, the driver dvips.def is not anymore generatedby graphics-drivers.ins: it has to be get from contrib/graphics-def.(Not a problem for me, I know where to find it; but it could bementioned in the doc.) [More ...] 2 Replies
 LaTeX3 and l3kernel requirements LARONDE Thierry Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:55:27 +0200 Hello,I'm the developer of the kerTeX TeX and al. distribution.kerTeX has, of course TeX and e-TeX, but not other engines.The first "engine" modification of LaTeX, a few months ago, was torequest the e-TeX extensions and drop vanilla TeX. OK, done.Now the last modification requires extensions not present in e-TeX.Until now I was able to provide the kerTeX users with a LaTeX package(I'm not myself a LaTeX user). I will not be able to follow if thisstays the same way. [More ...] 11 Replies
 Odd difference between \int in base LaTeX vs with amsmath package Don Hosek Thu, 1 Oct 2020 22:47:31 -0500 While looking into this question https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/565031/slightly-bigger-integral-in-exponent I found that the formatting of \int differs slightly when using the amsmath package vs the base LaTeX with the former using a scriptstyle integral while the base uses a textstyle integral.Given the following equation:$e^{i \int \!dt\,\frac{1}{2}m\dot x^2}$I getwith amsmath loaded andwithout it loaded. [More ...] 2 Replies