LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


For use of the LaTeX discussion group. The purpose of this list is to discuss the development of the successor to LaTeX version 2e. Please direct general questions about version 2.09 and 2e to other lists. It is, however, perfectly allowed to point out deficiencies which should be improved in the next version. Note: ----- If mail to a list member is rejected three times, the corresponding mail address is deleted without further notice.
Options: Use Classic View
Show Table of Contents

Robert Alessi
Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:44:06 +0100
Dear List,

Something happened with today's update.

Any of the -dev engines fail to compile the attached .dtx file if the
“dox” package is loaded, but I am not sure the failure is caused by
this package.

(pdf|xe|lua)latex-dev engines seem to bump into \@doc@describe which
is defined in doc-v3beta.sty.

Thank you for your help.


Show Replies 4 Replies
Jonathan Fine
Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:48:33 +0000

First, there's a really valuable and important accessibility thread for us
on the Blind Math mailing list. It's deeply rooted in real-world problems
and solutions. Mainly it's Jonathan Godfrey's response to Brandon Bigg's
query: Tutorial on Using RMarkdown?

In tomorrow's (Thursday) TeX Hour I'll share my initial thoughts on an
architecture for accessible typesetting. This will be a technical session,
focused on having control over what happens whenever input text is added to
TeX's horizontal list for the current paragraph. Last year a similar TeX
Hour conversation led to the concept of a Portable TeX Document, so

[More ...]
No Replies
Jonathan Fine
Wed, 5 Jan 2022 18:20:04 +0000

Happy New Year. May you and those around you be safe and happy.

When a year ago I started the weekly TeX Hour video meetings, I had ideas
as to what would happen. I'm pleased to say that I paid some attention to
what was going on around me, and that I was able to let go of many of my
previous ideas. Experience, someone said, is knowledge you get just after
you needed it!

[More ...]
No Replies