LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: \cs:c
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Sep 2008 12:24:05 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
Morten Høgholm wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Joseph Wright

> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>> Another quesition, I'm afraid.  In the main, I get the impression :w

>> macros should be avoided if there is an equivalent :c or :n one.

>> However, although there is \chk_exist_cs:c, the is no mention of \cs:c

>> (= \@nameuse).  I'd have thought this would be a good idea, or is there

>> a reason for avoiding this?

> 

> There is \cs_use:c (in l3basics I believe).



Ah yes.  This does not show up in the copy of source3.pdf I compiled

from the SVN over the weekend.  Is it documented?

-- 

Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2