Will Robertson wrote:

> Hello,

> 

> Packages (or "modules") in the expl3 bundles use the l3doc class for  

> documentation in the tradition of ltxdoc. Up until now, l3doc was  

> provided as a straight .cls file, which was in a bit of a mess.

> 

> This evening I was a little tired, so rather than attempting to write  

> any actual code (or work on my thesis), I bundled l3doc.cls into a  

> proper .dtx file and tidied it up somewhat. It's now a bit more  

> readable, and I managed to remove some code that was duplicated  

> elsewhere or was otherwise not really being used.

> 

> One maybe big change, though: it now loads the full expl3 suite and  

> declares itself as an "ExplClass". It doesn't actually use much LaTeX3  

> code, yet, but this is a change from some time ago when the  

> documentation for the LaTeX3 code could still be compiled using LaTeX2e.

> 

> If there's any problem with this, please let me know and I'll reverse  

> my decision.

> 

> ***

> 

> Meanwhile, if any members of this list would like to volunteer with  

> maintaining this class, it would be wonderful to create a Franken- 

> monster of l3doc, hypdoc, xdoc, and gmdoc. What little time I have  

> available now I'm spending on the expl3 test suite, so I suspect  

> without outside help this class will remain a patchwork of hacked- 

> together code to support whatever markup we happen to want/need while  

> writing the expl3 modules.



     You might consider throwing the docmfp package into the mix as well.



Peter W.