Date:
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:57:39 +0100
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
|
If you mention \includeonly, something different comes into my mind:
\includeonly expects a comma-seperated list like
\includeonly{file1,file2}. This is quite intuitive but has a few
restrictions, especially with spaces in filenames. (Though I think
spaces should be avoided, they definitely don't make life easier.)
The graphics package provides an other kind if list syntax:
\graphicspath{{file1}{file2}}.
In LaTeX3 it would be better to have only one type of list syntax, at
least at user level.
Regards,
Reinhard
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-4592165
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover mailto:[log in to unmask]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|