LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: David Carlisle <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:56:38 GMT
In-Reply-To: <v02130504af3f1549422d@[]> (message from Hans Aberg on Sun, 2 Mar 1997 13:48:57 +0100)
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (26 lines)
> I just made a definition command that can produce commands
> having optional arguments

You can not do this for commands that are to appear `mid word' without
breaking TeX's ligatures. You can not have *any* non expandable
command there. Even \relax which does `nothing' is too much. Compare

ff with f\relax f

So as Frank mentioned, `shortref' definitions are very constrained in
what they can have in their definition. They can not use \def or \let
or \futurelet or pretty much anything else that you normally would use
for parsing. they are more or less restricted to using

\expandafter\ifx\csname #1-xxx\endcsname\?

Well you can have optional arguments, perhaps by looking for [ with
these methods, but you could not use the normal \@ifnextchar mechanisms.